Ok, so I've been a bit negligent in my postings here. I've had a few noteworthy food experiences in the last few weeks that have not been properly documented.
First and foremost, Frances.
Everything aboaut this relatively young restaurant is a win. Its a small place on a quiet street in the Castro. As such, it has a neighborhood-y feel that it might not have in another location. Especially not when the restaurant is practically bursting with popularity. It took us 3 weeks to get a Wednesday night reservation (and that was at 8:45). True, we had a party of 5 and the restaurant isn't really set up to accomodate very many larger parties, but we also went on the tail of a couple sterling reviews in various food publications.
I'm happy to say that all the hype is absolutely worth it. The evening started off right as we were greeted by Patrick, the effervescent and supremely friendly host. The food that followed did not disappoint. We started with a "Market Shot" - a fun idea where they take whatever fresh fruit they can buy that day, spike it with some alcohol, and make a shot out of. On the night we were there, it was a citrus based drink with a whole bunch of fruits that I can't remember. It was GOOD.
We shared Bacon Beignets (because really, what's wrong with fried dough and bacon put together), the Spring Onion and Nettle soup, and the Dungeness Crab Salad to start. The beignets were good, and had a nice smokey bacon flavor. The soup was delicious and rich. The crab salad had large, fresh chunks of crab meat with some citrus- easily enough to share without fighting over the delectable crab pieces. Yum.
The menu is small-ish for entrees, but everything we tasted was executed well. I had the Sonoma Duck Breast, one of us got the steak, and the rest had the scallops. I have a hard time NOT ordering duck when its on the menu at a nice restaurant. This duck was worth it. Perfectly sliced, nicely pink in the center, with a layer of fat and crispy skin on each piece. Furthermore, the duck was served over Butter Beans. I don't think I've ever had butter beans before, but I can tell you now that I'm a fan. It might have had something to do with the fact that they were sitting in duck juice as well, but they were DELICIOUS. Yum.
Scallops were cooked perfectly and had a really nice sweetness to them. The other fun thing about Frances, is that they serve their house wine in a pitcher and charge by how much you drink (by the ounce). The price is relatively reasonable, and you have complete control over how much you want to drink! Fun!
So yes, highly recommended and totally reasonably priced for what you get. Go if you can manage to get a reservation.
---
In a semi-unfortunate (depending on how you look at it) collision of dates, we ended up going out again the next night to The Elite Cafe on Fillmore. This place is an upscale southern/creole restaurant. Everything we ate was good, but probably a little pricey for what it was. The biscuits were a highlight, and the ribs looked pretty delicious (although I didn't try them). The gumbo, while it was served in a HUGE portion, was just decent, as was the Jambalaya. They had a decent cocktail menu with some fun spins on classic drinks. All in all, I'm glad I went but wouldn't necessarily rush back. While I love southern food, I think you can do better for cheaper in the Bay Area.
---
Finally, had dinner with some friends who used to live in SF but have since moved back to the East Coast. We went to one of their old favorite neighborhood spots, the Nanking Road Bistro. I haven't been since these friends left, even though it's pretty close to our house. Now, the Bistro might not have the best food, technically speaking, but everything there is decent and they have one of those dishes that you feel must be made with some kind of addictive substance added. The "Honey Sesame Chicken," while maybe not one of the most authentic dishes, is delicious pieces of breaded, fried chicken in a sweet and spicy sauce. This is one of those dishes I could eat and eat and eat. On top of that, the Duck Biscuits (tender slices of duck in a little taco-like thing made of the same stuff as pork bun outsides) are quite tasty and the Chow Fun we ordered was also good.
When I'm in the mood for some saucy, americanized, yet quite satisfying chinese food, I need to remember that the Bistro is only a few blocks away.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Alice in Wonderland
I saw Alice in Wonderland at Pixar on Friday. I did not have high hopes, which is why I was happy to see it for free. Remarkably, it made somewhere over $115million over the weekend. Wow. This movie is not good. Don't rush out to see it, or, if you must, go in with low expecations. Also, don't see it in 3D (especially not if it costs you more). Unlike Avatar, this movie did not do a good job with the 3D technology.
I've always liked Tim Burton's style, but there are times when style trumps substance in his films. This was one of those times. The story was weak for me- scattered at times and utterly predictable at other times. The design was fun, but possibly a little bit on the dark side for the property. Usually I appreciate Burton's dark twist, but in this case it didn't feel quite right to me.
Furthermore (and perhaps most damning), I didn't care about any of the characters and didn't really ever feel any sense of danger. That's one of the problems with prophecy playing a major role in the storytelling- you already know what's going to happen. On top of that, the CG (Computer Graphics, for those of you who aren't in the "industry") was often jarring and took me out of the movie.
And the dance. Don't get me started on the dance. Ugh.
I've always liked Tim Burton's style, but there are times when style trumps substance in his films. This was one of those times. The story was weak for me- scattered at times and utterly predictable at other times. The design was fun, but possibly a little bit on the dark side for the property. Usually I appreciate Burton's dark twist, but in this case it didn't feel quite right to me.
Furthermore (and perhaps most damning), I didn't care about any of the characters and didn't really ever feel any sense of danger. That's one of the problems with prophecy playing a major role in the storytelling- you already know what's going to happen. On top of that, the CG (Computer Graphics, for those of you who aren't in the "industry") was often jarring and took me out of the movie.
And the dance. Don't get me started on the dance. Ugh.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Moon
Moon is a classy sci-fi flick closer to the 2001 vein than the increasingly popular sci-fi action hybrid (Star Trek, Avatar, etc). In fact, at first I was a little concerned that Moon was going to be too similar to 2001. Fortunately, at pretty much every step of the way, Moon defied expectations by taking the road less traveled by at every turn.
I don't want to say too much about the plot, since the movie is better if you don't know much going into it. I will say that the tone is strong throughout, and everything is well supported by the visuals. Sam Rockwell turns in an excellent performance and Duncan Jones did a great job in what I believe is his first time directing.
While I love some good old sci-fi action, I'm also a huge fan of movies that can tell stories without super-complex action sequences, and this one does it quite well. Go check it out!
I don't want to say too much about the plot, since the movie is better if you don't know much going into it. I will say that the tone is strong throughout, and everything is well supported by the visuals. Sam Rockwell turns in an excellent performance and Duncan Jones did a great job in what I believe is his first time directing.
While I love some good old sci-fi action, I'm also a huge fan of movies that can tell stories without super-complex action sequences, and this one does it quite well. Go check it out!
Friday, February 5, 2010
An Education
Had a chance to see another of the Best Picture contenders. An Education is a school girl in 1960s England who jumps at the chance to escape from her relatively humdrum existence to live a bohemian lifestyle with an older man. It's well written (Nick Hornby, adapted from someone's memoirs), well acted (especially the young Carey Mulligan and Alfred Molina), and generally well put together.
Structurally, I had a few problems. The big "problem" or hurdle that the main character has to overcome doesn't actually occur until towards the very end of the movie. This is problematic, in that the beginning of the film drags a bit without much tension. Throughout, there's the obvious discomfort that most viewers will experience with the youth of the main character and her relationship with an older man. In fact, its almost unbelievable to the audience that main character is so comfortable with the relationship since she's portrayed as someone with a pretty level head and not one to take crazy risks.
When it comes down to it, the message of the film is a little muddled as well. Choose the boring life? There are no shortcuts? Don't trust anyone?
In reading what I've written, I feel I may have been a little harsh. The movie was actually pretty good and I wasn't bothered by many of these things while watching. It's just after thinking about it for a little bit that some of the structural issues jumped out at me... I'd still recommend this one, if for nothing else than Mulligan's sensitive and ranged performance. Best picture? I'd say no. But they nominated ten films in a so-so year. What can you expect?
Structurally, I had a few problems. The big "problem" or hurdle that the main character has to overcome doesn't actually occur until towards the very end of the movie. This is problematic, in that the beginning of the film drags a bit without much tension. Throughout, there's the obvious discomfort that most viewers will experience with the youth of the main character and her relationship with an older man. In fact, its almost unbelievable to the audience that main character is so comfortable with the relationship since she's portrayed as someone with a pretty level head and not one to take crazy risks.
When it comes down to it, the message of the film is a little muddled as well. Choose the boring life? There are no shortcuts? Don't trust anyone?
In reading what I've written, I feel I may have been a little harsh. The movie was actually pretty good and I wasn't bothered by many of these things while watching. It's just after thinking about it for a little bit that some of the structural issues jumped out at me... I'd still recommend this one, if for nothing else than Mulligan's sensitive and ranged performance. Best picture? I'd say no. But they nominated ten films in a so-so year. What can you expect?
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Risotto
On a whim (ok, that's a lie, it was basically because the only things we had in the house was Arborio Rice, half an onion, and some parmesan) I decided to take my first stab at making a Risotto last night. I didn't want to go to the store, so I ended up using what we had lying around and combining two Marcella Hazan recipes (from this fantastic book). I combined a recipe for Sausage Risotto (that's why I keep those frozen sausages) and your standard "white risotto." In a move that I'm sure would make Marcella cringe, I used beef broth instead of chicken (didn't have beef broth on hand).
For those who haven't made it, Risotto is a little tricky because its easy to mis-cook. It involves regularly adding cooking liquid (broth and/or water) to a pot of rice that must be stirred constantly. The recipe instructs you to add water when the cooking liquid in the pot "runs out." Unfortunately, "runs out" isn't the most descriptive of terms. So it's a bit of a guessing game, although I imagine it doesn't matter all that much. Either way, you keep adding liquid and stirring until the rice is "done," another vague and possibly subjective description. It's relatively easy to either undercook the rice or have a finished product that ends up a little too soupy.
Mine turned out fairly well- perhaps could have cooked a little longer with a little more liquid. But the texture was close to what I was going for if not a tiny tiny bit underdone. I was happy I added the (real) parmesan cheese as that added some nice flavor to the sausage base, although next time I think I'll add more to make it even cheesier. I like that the rich flavor of the starches in the rice come through so well in this dish. The constant stirring is a bit of a pain, but the limited number of ingredients make this a relatively easy dish to prepare otherwise. I'll do it again for sure, maybe with some tips from my father who is a bit of a risotto specialist.
For those who haven't made it, Risotto is a little tricky because its easy to mis-cook. It involves regularly adding cooking liquid (broth and/or water) to a pot of rice that must be stirred constantly. The recipe instructs you to add water when the cooking liquid in the pot "runs out." Unfortunately, "runs out" isn't the most descriptive of terms. So it's a bit of a guessing game, although I imagine it doesn't matter all that much. Either way, you keep adding liquid and stirring until the rice is "done," another vague and possibly subjective description. It's relatively easy to either undercook the rice or have a finished product that ends up a little too soupy.
Mine turned out fairly well- perhaps could have cooked a little longer with a little more liquid. But the texture was close to what I was going for if not a tiny tiny bit underdone. I was happy I added the (real) parmesan cheese as that added some nice flavor to the sausage base, although next time I think I'll add more to make it even cheesier. I like that the rich flavor of the starches in the rice come through so well in this dish. The constant stirring is a bit of a pain, but the limited number of ingredients make this a relatively easy dish to prepare otherwise. I'll do it again for sure, maybe with some tips from my father who is a bit of a risotto specialist.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Lahore Karahi
Revisited what is considered to be one of the best Indian/Pakistani restaurants in San Francisco last night. As with most of the best Indian places, Lahore Karahi is a little divey. It's in the Tenderloin (one of the less nice parts of San Francisco) but it's worth the trip. Prices are reasonable verging on cheap for Indian food.
The thing that sets this place apart from your standard Indian spot, is that the food has much deeper more complex flavors and also feels less greasy. I tried a bunch of stuff including Tikka Masala and Vindaloo (standards), a few types of Naan, and a vegeterian spinach dish. The Vindaloo was my favorite dish of the evening with an earthy spiciness that maintained a lot of flavor with a lot of spice. The biryanis were also quite good and spicier than I'm used to- which, of course, I love.
Definitely going back here next time I want good Indian food and don't mind goiing out of my way to get it.
The thing that sets this place apart from your standard Indian spot, is that the food has much deeper more complex flavors and also feels less greasy. I tried a bunch of stuff including Tikka Masala and Vindaloo (standards), a few types of Naan, and a vegeterian spinach dish. The Vindaloo was my favorite dish of the evening with an earthy spiciness that maintained a lot of flavor with a lot of spice. The biryanis were also quite good and spicier than I'm used to- which, of course, I love.
Definitely going back here next time I want good Indian food and don't mind goiing out of my way to get it.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Adventures in Crock-Potting #2
The recipe for my second crock pot adventure came as a recommendation from a co-worker. It could not have come at a more opportune moment, as I found myself relishing some good, spicy, southern cooking. I used this recipe to make crock-pot Jambalaya with relatively successful results.
I didn't go shopping specifically for this dish, which meant I had to improvise a little bit with a couple ingredients. Most notably, I left out the celery (didn't have any, none at my little crummy corner store). Celery is generally used as an aromatic- a way to add a little flavor to stocks, broths, stews, etc. So I figured this dish would survive without it. I also didn't really like the idea of chunks of celery in my Jambalaya. Just didn't seem right to me. So that was out.
I also didn't have any pre-mixed Cajun/Creole Seasoning, but that was easily overcome by mixing up a batch of my own with spices I already had around (mostly Cayenne, Salt, Garlic Powder, Paprika, Red Pepper Flakes). In fact, this ended up working out better for me in a lot of ways, as I was able to add a little extra spice to suit my need for heat.
The one substitution that was a slight bummer was that I didn't have any andouille sausage. I thought there was some in the freezer, but I was wrong. Instead, I used spicy italian sausages. They worked fine, and had enough heat (spice-wise) to serve the function of the sausage, but definitely added a bit different spice flavor, whereas the andouille would have matched pretty well with the Cajun Seasoning. So not a huge loss, and I'd do it again if I needed to, but probably slightly less than ideal.
The other question was what to do with the rice. I didn't like the idea of serving my Jambalaya over rice. For me, the rice is an integral part of the dish and needs to spend at least some time stewing with the other ingredients and spices. I was too unsure to fully cook the rice in the crock pot with everything else, so I ended up taking the middle road and cooking the rice separately and then adding it to the crock pot for the last 20min (or so) of cooking. When I cooked the rice, I used half chicken brothe (I had extra) and half water for a little extra flavor. This ended up working out great and also helped absorb some of the extra liquid from the crock pot. Next time, I might try taking some of the liquid from the crockpot and cooking the rice in that (with some water). We'll see.
These last points highlight the main issue with this recipe- I ended up with a bit too much liquid in the crock pot. This isn't a huge deal, as I just scooped the good chunkies out with a slotted spoon. That said, if I try using some of the Jambalaya liquid to cook the rice it might help both add flavor to the rice and reduce some of the liquid in the pot.
I like this recipe and I would definitely make it again. For any of you who try this at home, if you like spice (like me) make sure you double (or more!) the amount of cajun seasoning or have some louisiana hot sauce (Crystal, Tabasco) on hand to add later.
I didn't go shopping specifically for this dish, which meant I had to improvise a little bit with a couple ingredients. Most notably, I left out the celery (didn't have any, none at my little crummy corner store). Celery is generally used as an aromatic- a way to add a little flavor to stocks, broths, stews, etc. So I figured this dish would survive without it. I also didn't really like the idea of chunks of celery in my Jambalaya. Just didn't seem right to me. So that was out.
I also didn't have any pre-mixed Cajun/Creole Seasoning, but that was easily overcome by mixing up a batch of my own with spices I already had around (mostly Cayenne, Salt, Garlic Powder, Paprika, Red Pepper Flakes). In fact, this ended up working out better for me in a lot of ways, as I was able to add a little extra spice to suit my need for heat.
The one substitution that was a slight bummer was that I didn't have any andouille sausage. I thought there was some in the freezer, but I was wrong. Instead, I used spicy italian sausages. They worked fine, and had enough heat (spice-wise) to serve the function of the sausage, but definitely added a bit different spice flavor, whereas the andouille would have matched pretty well with the Cajun Seasoning. So not a huge loss, and I'd do it again if I needed to, but probably slightly less than ideal.
The other question was what to do with the rice. I didn't like the idea of serving my Jambalaya over rice. For me, the rice is an integral part of the dish and needs to spend at least some time stewing with the other ingredients and spices. I was too unsure to fully cook the rice in the crock pot with everything else, so I ended up taking the middle road and cooking the rice separately and then adding it to the crock pot for the last 20min (or so) of cooking. When I cooked the rice, I used half chicken brothe (I had extra) and half water for a little extra flavor. This ended up working out great and also helped absorb some of the extra liquid from the crock pot. Next time, I might try taking some of the liquid from the crockpot and cooking the rice in that (with some water). We'll see.
These last points highlight the main issue with this recipe- I ended up with a bit too much liquid in the crock pot. This isn't a huge deal, as I just scooped the good chunkies out with a slotted spoon. That said, if I try using some of the Jambalaya liquid to cook the rice it might help both add flavor to the rice and reduce some of the liquid in the pot.
I like this recipe and I would definitely make it again. For any of you who try this at home, if you like spice (like me) make sure you double (or more!) the amount of cajun seasoning or have some louisiana hot sauce (Crystal, Tabasco) on hand to add later.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
The Lovely Bones
DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE. There, got that out of the way. This is the worst movie I've watched in a long time. Seriously. Don't know what they were thinking. Movie suffers from mixed (and confusing) tones, poor acting (and casting, for that matter), terrible music choices, and general cheeziness of the bad variety. It's too bad, because I've been told that the book is pretty good.
The parts of the movie that were most successful were:
Stanley Tucci
The suspenseful parts
Things missing from this movie:
A real main character
A single compelling arch
A sense of when special effects stop being cool
Skip it.
The parts of the movie that were most successful were:
Stanley Tucci
The suspenseful parts
Things missing from this movie:
A real main character
A single compelling arch
A sense of when special effects stop being cool
Skip it.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Lots of Movies
The combination of slowness at work and the approaching Academy Awards has inspired me to watch a whole lot of movies in the last couple weeks. All told, and in no particular order, I've seen:
Serious Man (see previous post)
Julie and Julia
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Brothers
The Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Informant
Up in the Air
Crazy Heart
...
oh, and Bruno. Ugh. Bruno. Don't ask why. The opportunity presented itself, and I watched. It was not funny.
Somewhat surprisingly, I actually really enjoyed all of these movies (except Bruno). In fact, its possible that my LEAST favorite was Fantastic Mr. Fox. Brief commentaries about the merits (and demerits) of each:
A Serious Man: See previous post.
Julie and Julia: I went into this expecting to not really like it, but I was pleasantly surprised. THe movie is sort of split in two- half is about Julia Child's past and how she became a chef (thumbs up) and half is about a woman who writes a blog about cooking every recipe in Julia's cookbook in a year (mostly thumbs down). I like food and cooking, so all of that was interesting. I though Meryl Streep was excellent- she NAILED the weird Julia Child mannerisms. Amy Adams, who I usually like, was less good and her character was not particularly interesting or likable.
Avatar: What can I say? A feast for the eyes and a whole lot of fun. Yes we've seen the story before (Fern Gully, Dances with Wolves, etc), but we've certainly never seen that world before nor have we seen technology used this successfully. I was skeptical about this due to the crazy hype, and I still think $500 million or whatever it cost is way way way too much for a movie. But it was a ride from start to finish and I enjoyed pretty much every minute- even the super cheesy parts.
The Hurt Locker: Really enjoyed this one- super tense, well developed characters, interesting look at the "new" kind of war. Focuses on the idea of war as a drug and makes the audience complicit by pumping up the tension to draw us in and make us "addicted" to the excitement.
Brothers: Heard mixed reviews and was pleasantly surprised. Acting was solid, although for some reason I don't like Natalie Portman (in anything). Super intense movie- not a feel good flick by any stretch. Something about family and super cute kids always gets to me... I had some issues with the structure and the music, but overall thought this was decent. I would be interested to see the same movie without knowing what happened to Tobey Maguier's character in Afganistant... I think it would have been more interesting for the audience to learn what happened at the same rate as the family...
The Fantastic Mr. Fox: It was fun, but something about it just didn't quite click for me. Wes Anderson has that tendency towards smugness and I think in this case it annoyed me. There were some clever parts, and, as usual in Wes Anderson movies the writing was the star. That said, I didn't particularly enjoy the animation style and thought the film was decent but not great. IMHO, "Up" is a much stronger film as a whole.
The Informant: Funny bits, but a bit too long. Matt Damon did a pretty decent job on the whole, but nothing in this movie is really worth talking about.
Up In The Air: I really enjoyed this movie and can't think of anything bad to say about it. Well made, well acted, thematically relevant... Yep, it's a good little movie. Does it deserve some of the best picture buzz it's getting? Probably not, precisely because it's a good little movie. For me, Best Picture needs to have something great, grand, or new. Not that dazzling eye candy should always win, but doing something new and different should be rewarded, and while this is certainly a good film, there's nothing "special" about it. Also, I'm a little tired of George Clooney. Too often I feel like he plays himself.
Crazy Heart: I love Jeff Bridges. He is a talented dude and is good in almost everything he's in. He was great in this role, and probably deserving of Best Actor. The movie itself is solid, although not super original- its sort of a combination of The Wrestler meets Ray/Walk the Line/any other movie about a musician's tough life. Bridges is the driving factor and the shining light of this film. That and I find Maggie Gyllenhal weirdly attractive.
Bruno: Skip it. Seriously. I maybe laughed twice.
I feel like there were more, but then again maybe not. That's a lot. I have a few more to see (most notably Precious) and I'll update when I do.
Serious Man (see previous post)
Julie and Julia
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Brothers
The Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Informant
Up in the Air
Crazy Heart
...
oh, and Bruno. Ugh. Bruno. Don't ask why. The opportunity presented itself, and I watched. It was not funny.
Somewhat surprisingly, I actually really enjoyed all of these movies (except Bruno). In fact, its possible that my LEAST favorite was Fantastic Mr. Fox. Brief commentaries about the merits (and demerits) of each:
A Serious Man: See previous post.
Julie and Julia: I went into this expecting to not really like it, but I was pleasantly surprised. THe movie is sort of split in two- half is about Julia Child's past and how she became a chef (thumbs up) and half is about a woman who writes a blog about cooking every recipe in Julia's cookbook in a year (mostly thumbs down). I like food and cooking, so all of that was interesting. I though Meryl Streep was excellent- she NAILED the weird Julia Child mannerisms. Amy Adams, who I usually like, was less good and her character was not particularly interesting or likable.
Avatar: What can I say? A feast for the eyes and a whole lot of fun. Yes we've seen the story before (Fern Gully, Dances with Wolves, etc), but we've certainly never seen that world before nor have we seen technology used this successfully. I was skeptical about this due to the crazy hype, and I still think $500 million or whatever it cost is way way way too much for a movie. But it was a ride from start to finish and I enjoyed pretty much every minute- even the super cheesy parts.
The Hurt Locker: Really enjoyed this one- super tense, well developed characters, interesting look at the "new" kind of war. Focuses on the idea of war as a drug and makes the audience complicit by pumping up the tension to draw us in and make us "addicted" to the excitement.
Brothers: Heard mixed reviews and was pleasantly surprised. Acting was solid, although for some reason I don't like Natalie Portman (in anything). Super intense movie- not a feel good flick by any stretch. Something about family and super cute kids always gets to me... I had some issues with the structure and the music, but overall thought this was decent. I would be interested to see the same movie without knowing what happened to Tobey Maguier's character in Afganistant... I think it would have been more interesting for the audience to learn what happened at the same rate as the family...
The Fantastic Mr. Fox: It was fun, but something about it just didn't quite click for me. Wes Anderson has that tendency towards smugness and I think in this case it annoyed me. There were some clever parts, and, as usual in Wes Anderson movies the writing was the star. That said, I didn't particularly enjoy the animation style and thought the film was decent but not great. IMHO, "Up" is a much stronger film as a whole.
The Informant: Funny bits, but a bit too long. Matt Damon did a pretty decent job on the whole, but nothing in this movie is really worth talking about.
Up In The Air: I really enjoyed this movie and can't think of anything bad to say about it. Well made, well acted, thematically relevant... Yep, it's a good little movie. Does it deserve some of the best picture buzz it's getting? Probably not, precisely because it's a good little movie. For me, Best Picture needs to have something great, grand, or new. Not that dazzling eye candy should always win, but doing something new and different should be rewarded, and while this is certainly a good film, there's nothing "special" about it. Also, I'm a little tired of George Clooney. Too often I feel like he plays himself.
Crazy Heart: I love Jeff Bridges. He is a talented dude and is good in almost everything he's in. He was great in this role, and probably deserving of Best Actor. The movie itself is solid, although not super original- its sort of a combination of The Wrestler meets Ray/Walk the Line/any other movie about a musician's tough life. Bridges is the driving factor and the shining light of this film. That and I find Maggie Gyllenhal weirdly attractive.
Bruno: Skip it. Seriously. I maybe laughed twice.
I feel like there were more, but then again maybe not. That's a lot. I have a few more to see (most notably Precious) and I'll update when I do.
Friday, January 22, 2010
A Serious Man
This is one of the movies I wanted to make sure I saw before the Academy Awards. I have to start by saying that I'm a huge Coen Brothers fan- I think they're some of the most consistently excellent filmmakers of this era. And, happily, A Serious Man did not disappoint.
The film is a continuation (or perhaps an expansion on) a theme present in many if not all of the Coen's movies- the lack of order (or tendency towards chaos) in the universe. The main character is a man of science (well, math, but that's close enough) who, do to the ever increasing disorder in his life turns to religious authorities for aid and comes away with... nothing. The comment is clear- no one, scientist nor religious leader can explain why things happen. While the results of this chaos are painful for the film's main character (played convincingly by Michael Stuhlbarg), they strike the darkly comic notes that the Coen brothers have perfected over the years and end up being remarkably entertaining of the audience.
The film is something of an assault on organized religion in general through the lens of Judaism. And what a perfect group to poke fun at when so much of Jewish culture are about remembering the sufferings of the last few thousand years. The Jews are a perfect representation of a group of people who have, at least in their self-identification, been victims of the lack of order in the world. The film certainly plays on Jewish stereotypes, but there are also the fine details that reveal the Coen's familiarity with the culture. And perhaps more importantly, the Rabbis are meant to represent religious leadership in general in a hilarious yet poignant commentary on religion's ability (or lack thereof) to shed any real light on why bad things happen to people who have "done nothing wrong."
The film is well made throughout- well shot, well edited and successful in using the fate of one poor individual to represent the plight of mankind living in this crazy chaotic world.
The film is a continuation (or perhaps an expansion on) a theme present in many if not all of the Coen's movies- the lack of order (or tendency towards chaos) in the universe. The main character is a man of science (well, math, but that's close enough) who, do to the ever increasing disorder in his life turns to religious authorities for aid and comes away with... nothing. The comment is clear- no one, scientist nor religious leader can explain why things happen. While the results of this chaos are painful for the film's main character (played convincingly by Michael Stuhlbarg), they strike the darkly comic notes that the Coen brothers have perfected over the years and end up being remarkably entertaining of the audience.
The film is something of an assault on organized religion in general through the lens of Judaism. And what a perfect group to poke fun at when so much of Jewish culture are about remembering the sufferings of the last few thousand years. The Jews are a perfect representation of a group of people who have, at least in their self-identification, been victims of the lack of order in the world. The film certainly plays on Jewish stereotypes, but there are also the fine details that reveal the Coen's familiarity with the culture. And perhaps more importantly, the Rabbis are meant to represent religious leadership in general in a hilarious yet poignant commentary on religion's ability (or lack thereof) to shed any real light on why bad things happen to people who have "done nothing wrong."
The film is well made throughout- well shot, well edited and successful in using the fate of one poor individual to represent the plight of mankind living in this crazy chaotic world.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
For want of a food processor...
I tried (and failed) to buy a food processor during the holidays. Macy's had a sale, but apparently I arrived a day late and the sale was over. I've wanted one for a while, but its been a little hard to justify as I don't cook all that much (athough I'm trying to cook more) and I'm perfectly capable of chopping. So I found myself waiting for another Macy's sale to drop the price under $100, but really wanting to make a recipe from my first issue of Cook's Illustrated (thanks for the subscription, Mom!).
The recipe was for Spicy Thai Chicken with Basil. A pretty standard Thai dish made with minced chicken. Sort of like this (although I didn't take this):
The recipe is pretty simple... if you have a food processor. As discussed, I do not. Yet I was determined to give it a go anyway. That translated into about 45 minutes of extra work: finely chopping basil, jalapenos (couldn't find the thai chilies at my local corner stores), garlic, and chicken. And mincing chicken, with no cleaver, is not a lot of fun.
That said, once the everything was chopped the actually cooking time is less than 10minutes total. So this really is an easily prepared and flavorful dish. The ingredients aren't too numerous either- probably only need an extra trip to the store to pick up some fresh chilies (jalapenos worked fine if no thai chilis) and shallots (the recipe actually has a bunch of shallots) as long as you have the thai standards of fish sauce and oyster sauce.
A good back-pocket recipe when a quick dinner is needed- at least after a food processor appears in my kitchen.
The recipe was for Spicy Thai Chicken with Basil. A pretty standard Thai dish made with minced chicken. Sort of like this (although I didn't take this):
The recipe is pretty simple... if you have a food processor. As discussed, I do not. Yet I was determined to give it a go anyway. That translated into about 45 minutes of extra work: finely chopping basil, jalapenos (couldn't find the thai chilies at my local corner stores), garlic, and chicken. And mincing chicken, with no cleaver, is not a lot of fun.
That said, once the everything was chopped the actually cooking time is less than 10minutes total. So this really is an easily prepared and flavorful dish. The ingredients aren't too numerous either- probably only need an extra trip to the store to pick up some fresh chilies (jalapenos worked fine if no thai chilis) and shallots (the recipe actually has a bunch of shallots) as long as you have the thai standards of fish sauce and oyster sauce.
A good back-pocket recipe when a quick dinner is needed- at least after a food processor appears in my kitchen.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Adventures in Crock-Potting #1
We received a crockpot/slowcooker as a holiday gift this year. It's taken us this long to finally get the thing out and start playing with it. Our first attempt came from a recipe found by mama Newman for Shredded Chicken Tacos. The beauty of this recipe (and slow cooker recipes in general) is that dinner can be ready when I get home. I tend to work late sometimes, add that to my decent length commute and sometimes its hard to find the motivation to shop and cook. Drop everything in the pot before heading to work, turn it on low for 6-8 hours, and voila! Dinner is hot and ready when I get home.
As a burgeoning foodie, I'm not sure if I should be offended by the idea of tossing all the ingredients in at the same time. The lack of technique involved goes against everything I've learned watching Top Chef or the detail-oriented care I tend to put in to my more elaborate cooking. That said, there are some nights when its nice to eat a home cooked meal without taking the time to cook it post-work.
The beauty is, on top of being almost absurdly easy, this dish was tasty and well textured. If I made it again, I'd add a little more spice (then again, there aren't many things I WOULDN'T add a little more spice to). I made tacos out of the meat, but it could just as easily be used as enchilada filling, nacho topping, taco salad topping, etc.
I intend to continue this series of Crock Pot adventures now that I've moved past the fear of leaving an electrical appliance on all day while no one is home. I'll have to continue to suppress the part of me that finds the whole notion insulting to the art of cooking, but that shouldn't be too hard if all the dishes that come out of the thing are as easy and tasty as this first one.
As a burgeoning foodie, I'm not sure if I should be offended by the idea of tossing all the ingredients in at the same time. The lack of technique involved goes against everything I've learned watching Top Chef or the detail-oriented care I tend to put in to my more elaborate cooking. That said, there are some nights when its nice to eat a home cooked meal without taking the time to cook it post-work.
The beauty is, on top of being almost absurdly easy, this dish was tasty and well textured. If I made it again, I'd add a little more spice (then again, there aren't many things I WOULDN'T add a little more spice to). I made tacos out of the meat, but it could just as easily be used as enchilada filling, nacho topping, taco salad topping, etc.
I intend to continue this series of Crock Pot adventures now that I've moved past the fear of leaving an electrical appliance on all day while no one is home. I'll have to continue to suppress the part of me that finds the whole notion insulting to the art of cooking, but that shouldn't be too hard if all the dishes that come out of the thing are as easy and tasty as this first one.
Speisekammer
I've been meaning to get out to Alameda to give this place a shot for a while. But Alameda is not particularly accessible and it took me until now to make it. Speisekammer is Alameda's bastion of German food and drink- like Suppenkuche East. I went for lunch with my coworkers as a celebration after a successful screening. And let me tell you, there may not be a better way to celebrate than a breaded, fried, meat cutlet.
To be fair, we started with potato pancackes (latkes to those of you from the tribe). They were beautiful and delicious:
For a main, all of us but one went with the Weinerschnitzel. And a good decision it was. On top of the two slices of breaded pork cutlet, we got roasted potatoes. They were delicious, and I quickly realized that was mostly because they had a whole lot of bacon mixed in. Bacon makes things good. Make a note.
My meal paired very nicely with my Weltenburger Kloster Dunkel (a dark wheat beer). Now my body wants a nap time, fortunately, things are slow at work so I might just take my body up on that offer. [NOTE: I don't sleep at work. At least, not on purpose.]
To be fair, we started with potato pancackes (latkes to those of you from the tribe). They were beautiful and delicious:
For a main, all of us but one went with the Weinerschnitzel. And a good decision it was. On top of the two slices of breaded pork cutlet, we got roasted potatoes. They were delicious, and I quickly realized that was mostly because they had a whole lot of bacon mixed in. Bacon makes things good. Make a note.
My meal paired very nicely with my Weltenburger Kloster Dunkel (a dark wheat beer). Now my body wants a nap time, fortunately, things are slow at work so I might just take my body up on that offer. [NOTE: I don't sleep at work. At least, not on purpose.]
Monday, November 2, 2009
Paranormal Activity
During the week leading up to Halloween, we figured it was the appropriate thing to do to head to our local cinema and watch a scary movie. Paranormal Activity seemed to be getting some good buzz, so that was our selection.
For those who don't know, its a Blair Witch style horror film- hand held cameras manned by the characters in the movie. It's kind of a dream come true for producers, as its really cheap to make with low production values, and pretty easy to sell. Apparently, Paranormal Activity only cost $15k to make. That is pretty low. And to this point its made something like $85million, so something tells me we'll be seeing a lot more of this type of movie in the future. I just hope they do them better.
For me, Paranormal Activity was lacking in, oh, how do I call it, scariness. It was only an hour and a half long, but the total amount of actual scary parts probably boiled down to about 5 minutes. If that. Too much of the movie was a boring- waiting for scary things to happen. And when the scary things happened, they weren't that scary. Now, I don't scare particularly easily in movies. But I can safely say I've seen at least 5 movies scarier than this one (in no particular order, and off the top of my head: Alien, The Ring, The Orphanage, The Descent, and the scariest movie ever: Event Horizon). And that's without spending much time remembering all the slashers I've seen. Shoot, come to think of it, I think Blair Witch was scarier.
I appreciate what the filmmakers were able to achieve with a small budget. In fact, I think sometimes small budgets make for better horror movies as filmmakers are forced to rely on storytelling and subtler forms of building tension. Alien was great because you rarely see the monster yet you still feel the tension due to the setting and the atmospheric effects. Along those lines, the creepiest parts of Paranormal Activity were the smaller creepy moments- like when the girl sleepwalks and stands staring at her sleeping boyfriend for a couple hours in a row.
I have always appreciated horror as a genre; it highlights the ways that filmmakers can use all the tools of the trade to manipulate the audience's experience and control their emotions. It also (often) provides a platform to attack/question/portray social norms that other more "serious" films have a hard time doing. For those reasons, I'm always interested in seeing a different approach to horror, even if the end result is less than successful.
For those who don't know, its a Blair Witch style horror film- hand held cameras manned by the characters in the movie. It's kind of a dream come true for producers, as its really cheap to make with low production values, and pretty easy to sell. Apparently, Paranormal Activity only cost $15k to make. That is pretty low. And to this point its made something like $85million, so something tells me we'll be seeing a lot more of this type of movie in the future. I just hope they do them better.
For me, Paranormal Activity was lacking in, oh, how do I call it, scariness. It was only an hour and a half long, but the total amount of actual scary parts probably boiled down to about 5 minutes. If that. Too much of the movie was a boring- waiting for scary things to happen. And when the scary things happened, they weren't that scary. Now, I don't scare particularly easily in movies. But I can safely say I've seen at least 5 movies scarier than this one (in no particular order, and off the top of my head: Alien, The Ring, The Orphanage, The Descent, and the scariest movie ever: Event Horizon). And that's without spending much time remembering all the slashers I've seen. Shoot, come to think of it, I think Blair Witch was scarier.
I appreciate what the filmmakers were able to achieve with a small budget. In fact, I think sometimes small budgets make for better horror movies as filmmakers are forced to rely on storytelling and subtler forms of building tension. Alien was great because you rarely see the monster yet you still feel the tension due to the setting and the atmospheric effects. Along those lines, the creepiest parts of Paranormal Activity were the smaller creepy moments- like when the girl sleepwalks and stands staring at her sleeping boyfriend for a couple hours in a row.
I have always appreciated horror as a genre; it highlights the ways that filmmakers can use all the tools of the trade to manipulate the audience's experience and control their emotions. It also (often) provides a platform to attack/question/portray social norms that other more "serious" films have a hard time doing. For those reasons, I'm always interested in seeing a different approach to horror, even if the end result is less than successful.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
F.A.T. #1: Saha
We recently held our first F.A.T. dinner and I'm going to label it a resounding success. At 5pm, I received a text to meet on the corner of Larkin and Sutter- right in the middle of the semi-sketch Tenderloin neighborhood. I tried to picture the area with little success- certainly couldn't think of any "fine" dining establishments in the area... Maybe some coke dealers, but no restaurants to speak of.
We met the rest of our party on that corner and followed this month's leaders into Saha, a very cute little restaurant situated in the unlikely Hotel Carlton. Saha is a self-proclaimed "Yemini Arabic Fusion" restaurant. Translation: delightful mixture of middle eastern/north african/french-californian flavors. They had a huge menu with a whole bunch of small plates and them some larger ones. The space is very cute and intimate- its not particularly large and not too loud.
The beauty of going with a big group (we were 8) is that we got to try a number of things. We started with a Sampler Platter, Saha Ravioli, and a Grilled Mezza Plate, which were large enough for eight of of to get a little taste of everything. The Saha Sampler comprised of a number of spreads and neverending baskets of Pita. Most of us agreed that the Raita-like spread was our favorite, along with the Zahaweg which is a spicy sauce made from tomatoes, peppers, and spices. The meat on the mezza platter was also all delicious, with the Merguez sausages highlighting the group.
For entrees, most of the meat-eaters agreed that the Sage Roasted Duck was absolutely delicious- easily the best dish of the night. It was tender and delicious and reminded me why I love duck. All of the dishes were hearty and flavorful. Other highlights were the Lamb Tangine and the North African cous cous. We were too stuffed for Dessert, although some of the options looked interesting.
All in all, the first F.A.T. experience was a huge success. We had a delicious dinner in a restaurant most of us had never heard of (good find, F.A.T. #1 leaders!). Hopefully we'll keep the ball rolling- our next meeting (a dive this time) is set for 11/12!
We met the rest of our party on that corner and followed this month's leaders into Saha, a very cute little restaurant situated in the unlikely Hotel Carlton. Saha is a self-proclaimed "Yemini Arabic Fusion" restaurant. Translation: delightful mixture of middle eastern/north african/french-californian flavors. They had a huge menu with a whole bunch of small plates and them some larger ones. The space is very cute and intimate- its not particularly large and not too loud.
The beauty of going with a big group (we were 8) is that we got to try a number of things. We started with a Sampler Platter, Saha Ravioli, and a Grilled Mezza Plate, which were large enough for eight of of to get a little taste of everything. The Saha Sampler comprised of a number of spreads and neverending baskets of Pita. Most of us agreed that the Raita-like spread was our favorite, along with the Zahaweg which is a spicy sauce made from tomatoes, peppers, and spices. The meat on the mezza platter was also all delicious, with the Merguez sausages highlighting the group.
For entrees, most of the meat-eaters agreed that the Sage Roasted Duck was absolutely delicious- easily the best dish of the night. It was tender and delicious and reminded me why I love duck. All of the dishes were hearty and flavorful. Other highlights were the Lamb Tangine and the North African cous cous. We were too stuffed for Dessert, although some of the options looked interesting.
All in all, the first F.A.T. experience was a huge success. We had a delicious dinner in a restaurant most of us had never heard of (good find, F.A.T. #1 leaders!). Hopefully we'll keep the ball rolling- our next meeting (a dive this time) is set for 11/12!
Friday, October 16, 2009
Where the Wild Things Are
Let the wild rumpus start!
Went last night to see this film in slightly odd circumstances- it was a coworker's birthday and she basically filled the theater with her (mostly drunk) friends. So perhaps not the best viewing environment for what is a fairly sensitive and emotionally complex film.
The book was a childhood favorite of mine (and most people, I'd imagine) and I've been excited about the film version. It is a tall order to translate a popular, short, children's book that has more pictures than words (seriously- there are only a few sentences in the book) into a 2hr (or so) feature film. Spike Jonze is certainly a good choice for the job as he has always been a very visual director and, if done correctly, this movie needed to place a lot of weight on the visuals.
And it did. The landscapes are beautiful, alternating between super bright bleak deserts and dark and twisted forests, vastly elegant seashores and shadowed caves. The landscape is a character in this film- often reflecting the moods of the characters (mostly Max). The Wild Things themselves are very cool looking- I think mostly "real" (non CG) with a little CG help at times? I just looked at some images from the book, and I can attest that the recreations of the Wild Things in the movie are pretty accurate.
It is a challenge to stick a pile of emotion on the face of a muppet, but the filmmakers did a good job of demonstrating the seething emotional sea of childhood. Because really, the Wild Things are reflections of parts of Max, and therefore reflections of childhood. They are made larger than life by Max's imaginings, each hyperbolic representations of a facet of Max's psyche or part of Max's life. And that's what the story is- Max coming to grips with himself and with the fact that he can't make everything perfect, that for all the rumpuses and moments of beauty, there will be fights and moments of darkness, fear, and confusion.
The film was beautifully realized and true to Sendak's original vision. It is slow, but in a contemplative way, not a boring one. A solid performance from the young boy who plays Max, along with beautiful visuals make the movie a success. Recommend to all.
Went last night to see this film in slightly odd circumstances- it was a coworker's birthday and she basically filled the theater with her (mostly drunk) friends. So perhaps not the best viewing environment for what is a fairly sensitive and emotionally complex film.
The book was a childhood favorite of mine (and most people, I'd imagine) and I've been excited about the film version. It is a tall order to translate a popular, short, children's book that has more pictures than words (seriously- there are only a few sentences in the book) into a 2hr (or so) feature film. Spike Jonze is certainly a good choice for the job as he has always been a very visual director and, if done correctly, this movie needed to place a lot of weight on the visuals.
And it did. The landscapes are beautiful, alternating between super bright bleak deserts and dark and twisted forests, vastly elegant seashores and shadowed caves. The landscape is a character in this film- often reflecting the moods of the characters (mostly Max). The Wild Things themselves are very cool looking- I think mostly "real" (non CG) with a little CG help at times? I just looked at some images from the book, and I can attest that the recreations of the Wild Things in the movie are pretty accurate.
It is a challenge to stick a pile of emotion on the face of a muppet, but the filmmakers did a good job of demonstrating the seething emotional sea of childhood. Because really, the Wild Things are reflections of parts of Max, and therefore reflections of childhood. They are made larger than life by Max's imaginings, each hyperbolic representations of a facet of Max's psyche or part of Max's life. And that's what the story is- Max coming to grips with himself and with the fact that he can't make everything perfect, that for all the rumpuses and moments of beauty, there will be fights and moments of darkness, fear, and confusion.
The film was beautifully realized and true to Sendak's original vision. It is slow, but in a contemplative way, not a boring one. A solid performance from the young boy who plays Max, along with beautiful visuals make the movie a success. Recommend to all.
F.A.T.
Tonight marks the first adventure of a new "dining club." We've dubbed the group, F.A.T., or Feasting About Town. The groundrules:
1. Don't talk about F.A.T/E.A.T.
2. Ha ha. Just kidding. Ha. Wish that was funny.
3. We will be dining out together once a month.
4. Every month, we will alternate between fine dining and a dive. Definition of fine dining/dive is up to the people scheduling that month, but generally everyone should spend less than $15 total (or so) at a dive, and the fine dining probably doesn't want to be over $25-35ish/entree or so.
5. Every month a different couple will pick the spot (we'll pick a name out of a hat or somehow randomize the selection order).
6. The couple selecting the location is responsible for making a reservation (if necessary) or making sure the place can hold 8 of us, or making whatever arrangements necessary. They will not reveal the location to anyone else until the day of the event. On the day of the event, the "host" couple will send an e-mail with TIME and ADDRESS (with cross streets). They will not reveal the actual restaurant and everyone is on the honor system not to look it up.
7. We will split all bills evenly. Unless someone has a major problem with this and a simple solution.
8. It might be fun if we dress up (a little) when we go out.
9. Events will all be on a shared google calendar.
10. I just wanted to have 10 rules. Nice, even number. So... Uh, We have to have fun?
Yeah... I wrote those. Some of them are lame, but what you going to do. And looks like I already broke rule number one with this post. oh well.
So we'll see how this goes. Fine Dining tonight, dive next month... I'm not up to pick a restaurant until December, so I have time to think... I'll post again after our inaugural dinner!
1. Don't talk about F.A.T/E.A.T.
2. Ha ha. Just kidding. Ha. Wish that was funny.
3. We will be dining out together once a month.
4. Every month, we will alternate between fine dining and a dive. Definition of fine dining/dive is up to the people scheduling that month, but generally everyone should spend less than $15 total (or so) at a dive, and the fine dining probably doesn't want to be over $25-35ish/entree or so.
5. Every month a different couple will pick the spot (we'll pick a name out of a hat or somehow randomize the selection order).
6. The couple selecting the location is responsible for making a reservation (if necessary) or making sure the place can hold 8 of us, or making whatever arrangements necessary. They will not reveal the location to anyone else until the day of the event. On the day of the event, the "host" couple will send an e-mail with TIME and ADDRESS (with cross streets). They will not reveal the actual restaurant and everyone is on the honor system not to look it up.
7. We will split all bills evenly. Unless someone has a major problem with this and a simple solution.
8. It might be fun if we dress up (a little) when we go out.
9. Events will all be on a shared google calendar.
10. I just wanted to have 10 rules. Nice, even number. So... Uh, We have to have fun?
Yeah... I wrote those. Some of them are lame, but what you going to do. And looks like I already broke rule number one with this post. oh well.
So we'll see how this goes. Fine Dining tonight, dive next month... I'm not up to pick a restaurant until December, so I have time to think... I'll post again after our inaugural dinner!
Kasa
Kasa is a hip new-ish Indian joint in the Castro in the same space as my favorite Castro burrito joint use to be. I've walked by a couple times and been curious about their menu which basically gives you two major options with some variations. You can order either:
Kasi Rolls
Classic Indian street food: A flaky, buttery roti (handmade bread) wrapped around one of the dishes listed below with marinated onions and chutney. Served with raita (yogurt). Order 2 or 3 for a meal.
or
Thali (Plate)
A homestyle Indian platter with one or two of the dishes listed below, roti (handmade bread), slow-simmered daal (lentils), rice, veggie salad, chutneys and raita (yogurt).
You get a selection of meat with either order. Since I went with Julia, we took the easy way out and got one of each. For the Thali, we ordered Chicken Tikka Masala, and for the Kasi Roll we had Lamb Curry. The Tikka Masala had a slightly different preparation from your standard version- the sauce was a little thicker and richer and quite a bit spicier (in a good way- then again, I always tend to find that spicier is better). The roti was delicious, and all the components of the plate went well together.
The Kasi roll was good as well. The bread was different from the roti on the Thali plate- maybe a bit sweeter? The lamb curry was good too- I love the richness of lamb. I could have actually used a little more spice in this.
The Kasi roll is a good amount of food for lunch, but if it's dinner and/or you're hungry, go for the Thali for sure.
I'd definitely stop back at this place. The counter service was super friendly and helpful and the food was delicious and pretty reasonably priced (especially the rolls).
Kasi Rolls
Classic Indian street food: A flaky, buttery roti (handmade bread) wrapped around one of the dishes listed below with marinated onions and chutney. Served with raita (yogurt). Order 2 or 3 for a meal.
or
Thali (Plate)
A homestyle Indian platter with one or two of the dishes listed below, roti (handmade bread), slow-simmered daal (lentils), rice, veggie salad, chutneys and raita (yogurt).
You get a selection of meat with either order. Since I went with Julia, we took the easy way out and got one of each. For the Thali, we ordered Chicken Tikka Masala, and for the Kasi Roll we had Lamb Curry. The Tikka Masala had a slightly different preparation from your standard version- the sauce was a little thicker and richer and quite a bit spicier (in a good way- then again, I always tend to find that spicier is better). The roti was delicious, and all the components of the plate went well together.
The Kasi roll was good as well. The bread was different from the roti on the Thali plate- maybe a bit sweeter? The lamb curry was good too- I love the richness of lamb. I could have actually used a little more spice in this.
The Kasi roll is a good amount of food for lunch, but if it's dinner and/or you're hungry, go for the Thali for sure.
I'd definitely stop back at this place. The counter service was super friendly and helpful and the food was delicious and pretty reasonably priced (especially the rolls).
Monday, October 12, 2009
German Feast
On Saturday night, we watched an episode of Three Sheets where the host traveled to Munich for Oktoberfest. Something in Julia's German heritage was so inspired by the sight of sausages and pretzels, that we cooked up an Oktoberfest feast last night.
Julia baked pretzels, trying two slightly different preparations. One batch was dipped in boiling water and then baked, while the second was brushed with an egg wash and baked. There was a slight difference in texture, but not much else particularly different between them. The boiled ones were a little chewier. The egg brushed ones might have had a slightly different color on the outside... hard to tell. Apparently to make pretzels the dark color that people expect, real German pretzel makers use lye or something. Yeah. That was a little much. But Julia's pretzels came out great, especially when dipped in a spicy brown mustard.
We also braised some Bratwursts. Sliced up onions and browned them in some butter (margarine), then emptied a jar of sauerkraut on top of the onions in the saucepan. Next, we added some thinly sliced apples to bring some sweetness to the kraut. Finally, placed the sausages on top of the sauerkraut and added enough beer to submerge all the 'kraut and sausages (ended up being 2 bottles of Sam Adams Oktoberfest). Left the whole shebang simmering over medium heat for about 20 minutes or so (added some sugar near the end when a taste revealed that it was still a little too sour), before removing the sausages and pan frying them briefly to get a little color and texture on the outside. Drained most of the liquid from the 'kraut, served with a selection of mustards. Delish.
Julia baked pretzels, trying two slightly different preparations. One batch was dipped in boiling water and then baked, while the second was brushed with an egg wash and baked. There was a slight difference in texture, but not much else particularly different between them. The boiled ones were a little chewier. The egg brushed ones might have had a slightly different color on the outside... hard to tell. Apparently to make pretzels the dark color that people expect, real German pretzel makers use lye or something. Yeah. That was a little much. But Julia's pretzels came out great, especially when dipped in a spicy brown mustard.
We also braised some Bratwursts. Sliced up onions and browned them in some butter (margarine), then emptied a jar of sauerkraut on top of the onions in the saucepan. Next, we added some thinly sliced apples to bring some sweetness to the kraut. Finally, placed the sausages on top of the sauerkraut and added enough beer to submerge all the 'kraut and sausages (ended up being 2 bottles of Sam Adams Oktoberfest). Left the whole shebang simmering over medium heat for about 20 minutes or so (added some sugar near the end when a taste revealed that it was still a little too sour), before removing the sausages and pan frying them briefly to get a little color and texture on the outside. Drained most of the liquid from the 'kraut, served with a selection of mustards. Delish.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Starbelly
The lady and I ate at Starbelly last night in advance of a "Glee" watching date at a friend's house in the Castro. I'd been to the opening night party for the new restaurant, but that was more of a cocktail party and I didn't really have a sense of what to expect on the menu. I do like the interior of the restaurant- it's small and modestly decorated but comfortable and not as tremendously loud as I had expected.
The menu is New Californian (which is a catchall to say it combines a few different cuisines including some American standards as well as some French and Italian touches). We wanted to try some different stuff, but had a hard time deciding. In the end, we picked a starter, a salad, and a couple entrees to share. We skipped the pizza because I DID have that at the opening party and it was mediocre.
As a starter, we got mini corn dogs. Because how can you not order corndogs when they're on the menu at a nice restaurant? There were definitely mini, although yummy- looked to be brats (or another white sausage) in tasty batter. A little steep $-wise at 6.50 for 4 of the little bite size guys, but tasty.
Our salad was good if not a little overdressed- butter lettuce with white nectarines and a shaved cheese of some sort. My dining partner thought the nectarines weren't ripe enough and I'm inclined to agree.
There were a number of entrees we were interested in, but we ended up trying the Porchetta and the half rotisserie chicken. We both really enjoyed the chicken- it was brined so quite juicy and delicious. It was served on a bed of some kind of bitter greens which (we both thought) were too bitter. But chicken was quite good. I'd order it again. (Note to self: look into brining a little more. Brined things always taste good.)
The Porchetta had good flavor and was served with yummy crunchy skin, but Julia found it too fatty for her taste and it was a bit unattractive sitting in a pile of grease. It was quite rich and while it was good I probably wouldn't order again.
We decided to order dessert because they sounded delicious. They also feature my bro's ice cream (Humphrey Slocombe!). We ordered the salted caramel Pot du Creme. Um. Delicious. I love me some salted caramel.
Would I go back to Starbelly? Possibly. It is one of the better options in the Castro (a neighborhood that is somehow bereft of decent places to eat despite a population that loves to dine out). That said, I also noticed a few new spots in the Castro that weren't around last time I lived near there, so perhaps I'm due to check some of em out!
The menu is New Californian (which is a catchall to say it combines a few different cuisines including some American standards as well as some French and Italian touches). We wanted to try some different stuff, but had a hard time deciding. In the end, we picked a starter, a salad, and a couple entrees to share. We skipped the pizza because I DID have that at the opening party and it was mediocre.
As a starter, we got mini corn dogs. Because how can you not order corndogs when they're on the menu at a nice restaurant? There were definitely mini, although yummy- looked to be brats (or another white sausage) in tasty batter. A little steep $-wise at 6.50 for 4 of the little bite size guys, but tasty.
Our salad was good if not a little overdressed- butter lettuce with white nectarines and a shaved cheese of some sort. My dining partner thought the nectarines weren't ripe enough and I'm inclined to agree.
There were a number of entrees we were interested in, but we ended up trying the Porchetta and the half rotisserie chicken. We both really enjoyed the chicken- it was brined so quite juicy and delicious. It was served on a bed of some kind of bitter greens which (we both thought) were too bitter. But chicken was quite good. I'd order it again. (Note to self: look into brining a little more. Brined things always taste good.)
The Porchetta had good flavor and was served with yummy crunchy skin, but Julia found it too fatty for her taste and it was a bit unattractive sitting in a pile of grease. It was quite rich and while it was good I probably wouldn't order again.
We decided to order dessert because they sounded delicious. They also feature my bro's ice cream (Humphrey Slocombe!). We ordered the salted caramel Pot du Creme. Um. Delicious. I love me some salted caramel.
Would I go back to Starbelly? Possibly. It is one of the better options in the Castro (a neighborhood that is somehow bereft of decent places to eat despite a population that loves to dine out). That said, I also noticed a few new spots in the Castro that weren't around last time I lived near there, so perhaps I'm due to check some of em out!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)